Saturday, February 25, 2023

Jimmy Carter

With the news that ex-president Jimmy Carter has entered hospice care at his home, articles and reviews of his life have begun to surface, and will most likely continue to gain traction until he passes from our world. 

Before that sad event, I thought I would offer my own opinion, although this will not be the first time I posted about Carter, as I had done a comparison blog about him and Donald Trump in August, 2015, before the 2016 presidential election. See attached link.

https://wurdsfromtheburbs.blogspot.com/2015/08/jimmy-carter-and-Donald-trump.html

It has been over forty years since Carter lost his bid for reelection.  In the immediate years after his departure from the White House, most people considered him to have been a poor president. Of course, time is necessary to truly evaluate a president's effectiveness, and at this point, he has moved up the ranks of presidential ratings although still falling in the middle of the pack, at best, but in he bottom half still.

But, as I mentioned in my first post about Carter, his ranking in terms of his humanity, would place him towards the top. One of his most amazing accomplishments was his desire to combat diseases that are not well known in America but that effect millions of people worldwide, especially those people who reside in the third world. (You know, those countries that Trump referred to as sh**hole places). In particular, his work to eliminate the effects of the Guinea worm stands out. This NPR article explains it very well.

https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2023/02/23/1158358366/jimmy-carter-took-on-the-awful-guinea-worm-when-no-one-else-would-and-he-triumph

I know it is easy to illustrate Carter's attributes by comparing him to ex-president Trump, but I will do so anyway, with one other example. In 1975 during the run-up to his successful presidential election, Carter admitted, to Playboy magazine of all places, that he had lusted in his heart. At the time, this was considered one of the least savvy political moves of all time. His political advocates shook their collective heads while his political opponents attacked him for his admission, one in particular saying that "he never thought Christ's teachings would be discussed in Playboy and I am a Baptist." 

The simple fact is that Carter was acknowledging that despite his fervent belief in his religion and its tenets, he was an imperfect person, as we all are, and that it is far better to admit one's shortcomings, and to pray for guidance, than to pretend every other human being doesn't commit adultery in their heart from time to time.

Contrast that with the orange man who not only admits that he enjoys seeing semi-naked young women in the backrooms during beauty pageants (as most men would), but that his celebrity allowed him to grab their genitals with impunity. And then to brag about it, as another example of his privilege and ability to avoid the consequences of his misdeeds. Carter was contrite in his admission that he sometimes fell short of his desired morality while Trump did not consider his actions to be ashamed of, but to brag about. In effect, the perfect grab. 

Is it any wonder that he believed that shaking down a foreign leader for dirt on his political rival in exchange for military equipment, or asking a state's attorney general to "find" enough votes so he could win that state's electors, were OK as well?

Sorry, I shouldn't be demeaning Carter by mentioning Trump in the same post, but I also know that when Carter does pass, and pundits and politicians begin their stream of accolades, there will be Trump supporters who will pretend that their guy could hold a candle to this man. 

Another area where Carter exceeds so many other people, let alone presidents, is in the area of humility.  Carter continues to live in Plains, Georgia, in the modest house he bought in 1961. He doesn't hawk products with his name on them, doesn't jam his faith down our throats while piling up material possessions. He is gracious when praised, thoughtful when criticized, quick to share credit, slow to blame others. To me, Jimmy Carter is someone I would welcome in my home and welcome at my table to share a meal and a chat.  

Finally, let's talk about Carter's ability to inspire others to do good. While he did not found Habitat for Humanity, his non-profit organization has affiliated itself with this tremendous organization for over 30 years. Where you can often see images of various ex-presidents at big name sporting events or Hollywood awards shows or on the golf course, Carter is more likely to be found with a hard hat and a hammer at a construction site, assisting in the building of a home for someone else, someone in need. My wife and I began giving to Habitat as a result of Carter's example, as I am sure millions of other Americans have, not to mention the tens of thousands of people who volunteer their time as well.

So, perhaps Jimmy Carter was not one of the greatest presidents ever, or even in the top twenty. But as for being a great human, a great example for people to do the right thing, a great husband, father and neighbor, we will be hard pressed to identify anyone who epitomized the true meaning of living a life of service to others as James Earl Carter Jr.   

Thursday, February 23, 2023

Bo Knows...Empathy

Just finished reading "The Last Folk Hero, The Life and Myth of Bo Jackson", which I received for Christmas.

I am old enough to remember Bo Jackson, especially that infamous 91 yard TD run on Monday Night Football, and that ridiculously funny Bo doesn't know Diddly Nike ad commercial. But to be honest, I didn't remember (or never knew) the details of his early life, his personal struggles with stuttering, his baseball career, and the devastating injury that cut short his participation in both football and baseball. 

As told by Jeff Pearlman, although without the benefit of any time spent interviewing Bo, for most of the book I did not like Bo Jackson. He was a bully, quick to threaten and fight, treated women as mere sexual objects (at one point he was engaged to 2 different women at the same time), and thought the rules didn't apply to him. More than once I was tempted to put the book down and stop reading, but figured his comeuppance was inevitable.

Bo took his amazing physical talent for granted, assumed it would last forever, and did nothing to work at his craft, or even to maintain his body. The poster boy for a selfish athlete, if ever there was one. 

But this was not a "hit" book by Pearlman. While he certainly demonstrated just how unlikable Bo Jackson was to many he encountered, Pearlman specified the why. Bo was raised in poverty whose mother did not spare the rod, and whose father spent most of his time across town with his wife and children. Hurt before being hurt was his self defense against the world. And trust no one, since, other than his abusive mother, there was no one trustworthy in his life.

For some, Bo Jackson is the greatest athlete who ever lived, rivaling Jim Brown and Jim Thorpe. His exploits, in both sports, college as well as professional, however, are instances of greatness, not greatness exhibited over time. His actual stats are middling at best. Yet, perhaps no other athlete ever, will be known for doing something "never seen before, or since". From massive home runs to incredible acts of strength and speed, to his improbable physique, his natural physique, not one which came from a weight room or bottle, Bo caused more jaws to drop, jaws, not just of reporters and paying customers, but fellow athletes who were also elite members of their sport. 

It wasn't until after Bo's hip injury that he became a likable character. Not just out of sympathy, we always feel sympathy for someone whose life is inextricably changed by an accident, but due to how he reacted, how he changed afterwards. While ego may still have been at work, he devoted countless hours of physical therapy to prove wrong all who said he would never play again. He became a better teammate, more empathetic to fellow athletes who were also, in the end, packages of meat being used by owners, fans, and businessmen.

Also, once he settled down with fiance number 2, and had children, he did everything he could do to be the father he never had. He became a little more humble with the realization that athletics were nice, even fun and certainly monetarily rewarding, but not as important as family. He began seeing and treating other people, not just as someone who might hurt or take advantage of him, but as someone to get to know, perhaps even to help. 

And he did help, other athletes he met as his career faded, and his community, especially fellow Alabamians in 2011 when the state experienced devastating hurricane damage. 

Bo Jackson's story can certainly be viewed as an American success story, but not because he made millions of dollars playing sports, and because he became a world wide recognized figure. 

One might even say his life was doubly successful. He earned millions of dollars playing a game, two games actually, and through sports endorsements, then earned the respect of his fellow human beings by living his life simply after sports, with the emphasis on family and empathy for others.

Perhaps some day, someone like Bo Jackson will be remembered for that second part of his life when he was able to overcome his learned distrust, his learned 'hurt before being hurt' philosophy, and his overall brutal upbringing, and became a man happy with his family, happy with his situation, living for the now and the future, and not stuck in the hero worship past that sports can evoke. Someone capable of empathy for those he encountered. 

I posted the following early last year, also about empathy, if interested.   

Thursday, February 16, 2023

The Conversations, Part 3

                                                 The Conversations


As Bob exited his car, he spotted Mark doing the same, a few aisles to his left. He quickly locked his car, then called out Mark's name.

The two friends greeted each other warmly. It had been a bit longer than usual since their last meeting, as both business and family matters had garnered their time and attention. As they walked, they talked, updating each other with family news, a process that continued as they waited a few minutes for a table to clear, then were seated. By the time their order was taken, they were past the pleasantries, and into the topic for today.

After the three young men returned from their Olympic trip to Montreal, they used the pop-up trailer they had purchased for the adventure as a summer party spot. Most of those nice weather parties occurred in Bob's parents' back yard, the little trailer at full occupancy. With electricity run from the house, they listened to music, smoked pot, drank beer, and laughed like there was no tomorrow. 

As time passed, and Bob and Mark's friendship cemented, they used the trailer to visit Williamsburg, Virginia, with a side visit to Kings Dominion Amusement Park. It was during this trip that they honed their multi-tasking skills, conquering the challenge of driving while eating, drinking and smoking. And talking. 

At the time, Bob and Mark didn't question whether their discussions were unique for teenagers.  Of course, marijuana was often attributed by young people as a way to open their minds, to free their thoughts to go beyond regular associations. To imagine how our entire universe could be just a molecule under the fingernail of a sentient being beyond our understanding, just as an entire universe could exist in a molecule under the fingernail of each of us. 

What they didn't know then, but had learned over the years, is that marijuana, like any drug, while perhaps allowing them to feel less constrained, only made more prevalent what was already within. Reflective and thoughtful people became more so, as did those exuberant and outgoing. Emotional people more easily expressed their emotions, horny people (also known as teenagers in most of the world) became more affectionate, compassionate people showed more empathy. 

And assholes, well, we all experienced how they behaved.

"Did you ever imagine that someday we would be talking about how to fix Social Security, and not just because it is an issue but because we were on the verge of drawing it?" began Bob.

At one point, the young men had begun a ritual of meeting at the 7-11 where Mark was working on the weekends from midnight to 8 AM. The lack of business allowed them to talk for hours with little interruption. And, while the occasional local police would sporadically pop in for doughnuts and coffee, it wasn't enough to keep them from using artificial means to accentuate their discussions.

"Well, it might be fair to remember that it was in the early 80's that the last major reform to Social Security was enacted, so it would make sense now, 40 years later, that another change is necessary," countered Mark.

"Well, to be honest, I did a bit of research on the Greenspan Commission and its recommendations which resulted in the Social Security Amendments of 1983. It was as a result of those reforms that you and I need to wait until we are close to 67 years old to receive the full benefit of our contributions. There were also alterations to how the yearly adjustment would be calculated, and when social security benefits would be taxable. Amazingly, it was a bipartisan vote, in both directions, meaning that in the Senate, there were 32 GOP Senators for, 8 against, 26 Senate democrats for, 6 against and 28 no votes, 14 from each party. Can you imagine such a vote today? In the House, 163 Dems for, 54 against, 51 no votes, 80 GOP for, 48 against, 38 no votes."

"What was really interesting is that their was a statement in the law that basically said that this reform package demonstrated for all time our Nation's ironclad commitment to the Social Security system. Ironclad is their word, not mine."

"Impressive info, Mark", remarked Bob. "I can't top that except to say that it seems clear that neither party 'won' what was, I would suspect, serious and tense negotiations, yet our senior citizens, our generation of baby boomers, were the benefactors. Not too mention our parents who are dependent of their SS checks to have options related to where they live, how they eat, and whether they can maintain a respectable standard of living."

For the next 15 minutes, the friends focused on their meal while organizing their thoughts for the coming discussion.

"So, now here we are 40 years later, facing another prediction of reduced benefits within 15 years," started Bob. "There seems some obvious alterations that could be enacted. One that seems to be advocated is the idea of raising the full benefit retirement age again. I have heard it should be pushed to age 70. But I have also read that this adjustment could really impact blue collar workers. There is data out there now that suggests that people with hard, physical jobs are less able to make it to the adjusted ages that exist now. Many people are forced to retire from those jobs before reaching their full benefit age, which means they get lower monthly checks, perhaps good for the overall system, but not good for them if they live into their mid 80's and beyond. It is also why many seniors are still working part time, to make those few extra bucks in addition to their SS checks."

"Like you," responded Mark with a smile.

"Well, actually, I am in a much better position than most, in that I am enhancing my pension check with my part time work. I should be able to reach my full benefit age in 2 years without drawing social security because I earned a pension, something that has withered on the vine these last 40 years, will probably not exist by the time our kids retire."

"I would favor an extended retirement age target that uses reward to encourage people to wait longer, not penalties for not waiting. The carrot without the stick, so to speak. Also, assuming our labor shortage will not be going away anytime soon, encourage the private sector to provide health benefits for part time workers. Since Medicare is also at future financial risk, wouldn't it make sense to allow people to stay on their employers health coverage as long as they work?"

"Encourage them how?" asked Mark. 

"Perhaps some form of tax break that shares the cost. And, of course, access to health insurance programs that aren't tied to the size of the company, so all businesses could gain the best rates. If we could even the playing field so that all people, regardless of the size of the company which employs them could receive good coverage, more people might sacrifice slightly higher pay to work for small businesses, knowing that, at least their health plans are the same. Our current system punishes workers in small businesses, let alone small business owners, through its unequal access to health coverage."

"Or perhaps a universal health care system," replied both men almost simultaneously.

This was a topic they had discussed many times before. And would again, perhaps sooner rather than later.

"What do you think about raising the income level for which social security taxes are levied and collected?" asked Bob.

"Well, that would certainly effect me more than you," replied Mark. "This year the income level is set to $160,000. Anything earned over that amount is not taxed for social security, which also means that you only earn credit for that income which effects your future payment. But to answer your question, yes, I would begin expanding that amount, perhaps in some type of sliding scale. Frankly, I would begin raising that number in increments of $50K for at least the next 10 years. But, to save on the back end, I would only count the first ten, maybe $20K towards the benefit. After all, people earning that much will have less need for the safety net that social security is meant to supply."

"That brings up a good point," started Bob. "How many millionaires, even billionaires who most likely have earned the max distribution, choose to forego the benefit?"

"Can someone do that?" asked Mark.

"Yes, it is actually a simple form. And, it is not irrevocable, so if someone's situation changes, benefits can be claimed," answered Bob. "Doesn't it seem odd that most people don't know that the super rich can claim their benefits, and that they can decline them as well? Do you think some might call it an act of patriotism to not draw social security when you really don't need it, or an act of foolishness? What is interesting is that most of the social security earned by the wealthy is taxable, so their net amount is much less than what someone earning the max amount would get if that was the only income for that person."

"Again, perhaps we need to add a carrot to this process. Not taking the benefits is the stick, not taking the benefits and using, say half of the amount that one would have received as a tax credit, would provide the carrot."

"What about immigrants, legal and otherwise?"

"The same rule that applies to anyone who works in the United States, applies to immigrants. If they are paid by an employer who follows the law, social security taxes are collected, and if the individual works his or her 40 quarters as required, they earn benefits. What is ironic is that too many allegedly patriotic employers hire illegals to avoid paying taxes, local, state and federal, including social security. This law breaking not only robs the United States of tax revenue in the short run, it harms the social security system in the long run by not providing needed income to thwart future shortfalls. What is funny about immigration is that allowing more people to work, legally, towards future citizenship, provides some much needed assistance to fill the gap in our current labor shortage, and collects more tax revenue for now, as well as for social security later."

"Speaking of the self employed," began Mark, "do you think there is room to change that process, change the fact that someone in business for themselves must pay the 6.2% twice, once as an employee and once as an employer?"

"What did you have in mind?" asked Bob.

"Well, clearly, we don't want to penalize someone for running their own business by reducing their benefit due to a reduced tax structure. But, if social security is strictly based on income, then perhaps we can give those people a discounted rate, without altering their eventual benefit. This might also encourage more people to attempt to start a small business, especially in conjunction with giving them access to the same health insurance as the big companies. The 6.2 % rate has not changed since 1990, while the 1.45% rate for Medicare has remained the same since 1986. What may surprise you is that the social security tax rate doubled from 1962 to 1990, from 3.125 to the current 6.2%, in those 28 years but hasn't change a lick in the last 32 years. Not that I necessarily believe that higher taxes is the only answer to shortfalls, but perhaps it is time to increase the tax, at least on a means testing basis. I certainly don't have all the numbers but we know the OMB can apply any plan to future revenues. I would hope we could increase the SS tax for everyone, plus an additional percentage for those with a taxable income over $250K per year, while also reducing the combination paid by the self employed to, perhaps 5 and 5% as opposed to the current 12.4%. That adjustment plus the slow increase of eligible income that is taxed as we mentioned before should certainly make the system more solvent, while, again, also encouraging the creation of small businesses."

https://www.ssa.gov/oact/progdata/taxRates.html     

"But Mark, you know there is little tolerance for raising taxes," responded Bob. "There is a growing force of pundits and politicians who continue to label Social Security and Medicare as entitlement programs that are ruining America by making it a socialist country. Perhaps Reagan and the Congress of 1983 thought that reform was a ironclad commitment to Social Security, and I certainly believe that the vast majority of Americans believe in the system, but there are some people of influence who are able to associate policies and ideas that help the average worker with concepts that have negative implications, such as those who bandy about the notion that these programs make us a socialist country."

"That is the importance of leaders who are fully transparent, who give us the good, the bad and the ugly of their policies, so that we can determine when and where to compromise. Unfortunately, we seem to only want to hear the good, while pretending that the bad and ugly need never to exist. As if any law or policy, when enacted, has not included some winners and some losers. No policy helps everyone, but the best policies help the most while harming the least."

"That is what bothers me about everyday working folks buying into the propaganda that student debt belief is bad. Propaganda that is paid for by people who are neither students, nor working class, not struggling pay check to pay check. Why is denying assistance to our children good for America?  But, then again, it shouldn't surprise us when these are the same people who push the idea that Social Security is bad for America, even though statistics show that upwards of 50% of seniors depend on this system for at least half of their income."

"Well," concluded Mark, "let's hope that both sides of the aisle can negotiate this issue towards the idea of helping to solve the problem as opposed to which party can claim victory just as they did in 1983."

The check having been settled, the friends began their walk to their cars. Those innumerable nights when they had talked for hours at the 7-11, had played pool in Mark's parents basement while engaging in similar discussions seemed both long ago and just like yesterday. It was a pleasant feeling that both men appreciated, that connection to the past with today and its ever changing yet also similar debates and conversations. 

Tuesday, February 14, 2023

The Hole

                                       The Hole 

The news had broken slowly, for a number of reasons.

To begin with, while data had been collected for decades, the information as well as the understanding behind it had been kept secret from the public. To be honest, it was truly remarkable that no details had leaked in all those years, considering the number of high level officials, scientists, and bureaucrats, foreign and domestic, who had been in the know.

Additionally, the intricacy of the program, the data collection program that is, was extremely difficult to understand, even for those who had been studying the situation throughout the years, let alone for the politicians they informed. As for the public, it was decided right from the start that any premature release of the premise behind the data would certainly be catastrophic.

But mostly, the process was determined to be of the highest top secret classification because there was no consensus as to what was really happening. The Hole was certainly increasing in size, slowly but measurably, which indicated purpose to most of the scientists studying it, but the how, the why, and the who, was the biggest source of the concern.

The one thing everyone seemed to agree on was the when, although that agreement was in contention for much of the first 15 years from the first discovery of The Hole. Fortunately, as 15 years became 30, and 30 became 50, the technology being employed to study the phenomenon seemingly caught up with the sophistication of the phenomenon itself, leading to virtual agreement that the hole had formed just as the 20th century dawned.

Reaction among those involved varied from generation to generation, and country to country. While all agreed that revelation needed to be delayed, what to do about it, was debated vociferously. The scope of ways to address The Hole was as revealing of the nature of humankind, although the idea of a military solution was never a viable option, something that, in retrospect, made for interesting philosophical discussions of those who promoted a positive spin on the situation.

Definitive agreement of the existence of The Hole occurred in the decade following the second World War. While scientists from a number of countries had been examining the phenomenon independently, it wasn't until the remnants of the animosity of World War 2 had begun to dissipate, at least among the scientific community, that cooperation produced some agreement, especially in the area of tracking the progress of the The Hole's size. 

Once various nations began sharing this progression, an agreement was signed by all of the nations which had already been studying the curiosity, as well as those countries deemed crucial in moving forward with a global approach. Amazingly, this agreement was not the source which led to the release of details surrounding The Hole, amazing in that politicians are so often the least responsible breed of people when it comes to keeping a secret, especially when the release of that secret could lead to popularity, power, or both. 

Ultimately, it was an obscure technical paper released in a little read scientific journal that, unknowingly, presented some evidence of The Hole, without naming it such. Basically, someone not in the loop, figured it out, or at least determined that something strange was occurring, and detailed it in her article. 

At that point, speculation about the effects of The Hole slowly began to circulate, first among those smart enough to understand the ramifications of the article's observations, then into the conspiracy driven media outlets which reported on some of the more outlandish speculations, then doubled down to create stories that would spark the interests and wag the tongues of those who saw disaster, subterfuge, and blame in everything they read.

At first, it was easy to deny those kind of conclusions, but serious people were also discussing the strange data from that previously unknown scientist. And once discussions began to enter academia, in lecture halls, and on well established media programs, a representative group of the leaders of those nations who had maintained the clandestine operation, called for a press conference to quell the absurd and reveal the long held secret.

But first, those same leaders had to decide just what to say, considering they still weren't sure what was happening. They knew enough that uncertainty could be just as damaging. How many actions are inspired, not by reason or drive, but by fear of the uncertain? How often do we stay inert in our difficult situations, work, family, personal, community, not because we don't want those circumstances to improve but because we fear it could be worse?

The leaders knew that answers needed to be offered, even if those answers were not completely true, and not the full story. Their logic was sound, even if the reason it was now incumbent of them to be honest, rested in a decades long dishonesty.

As I sit here, writing this account, I can't help but wonder if that very reasoning was caused, in part, by The Hole.

On the day of the release of the biggest news story in history, a somber group of men and women gathered on a stage within the United Nations Building and addressed the press, and the world.

"In the past 5 decades or so, scientists have been observing the growth of what we have termed, a Hole," began the leader at the center of the group. "We call it a Hole, only to indicate that it is a lack of something that was there, as it is not a physical hole, like a hole in your shirt, or a hole in the ozone layer. 

The leader paused, took a breath, then looked squarely at the camera rather than the teleprompter.

"During those years, our scientists didn't understand what we were seeing, measuring, only that something was changing. It wasn't that long ago that we were able to determine that The Hole began to develop sometime in the early 20th century, but even that conclusion took decades of examining data about the surrounding layers of atmosphere around our planet." 

She paused, glanced to her left and right, then began again. "What we eventually realized was that in addition to the five known layers of our atmosphere, the troposphere, stratosphere, mesosphere, thermosphere and exosphere, there is a sixth layer which we have named the selfishsphere."

She waited for the laughter to ease, smiling, as fake a smile as she ever could concoct.

"Unfortunately,", she began again, "I am serious. After years of analysis, reams of papers, thousands of conferences, we have conclusive proof that there is a layer of, for lack of a better word, insulation, that acts as a filter to keep a specific kind of cosmic ray from penetrating to the surface of earth. It is that ray, or should I say the accumulation of that ray, that was discussed in the journal article which led to why we are here today".

"I don't want to go into all the research that has been done in the area of selfishness and altruism. Suffice to say, there is significant evidence that, as a species, we are instinctively more cooperative than selfish, and that from an evolutionary perspective, we have advanced more out of cooperation than selfishness. So yes, while there are individuals that benefit dramatically by being selfish, as a species, we are inherently good, inherently sympathetic."

"However, using advanced computers models, there seems to have been a change in our levels of sympathy, and selfishness in the last 100 years or so. Two World Wars, the holocaust and innumerable other instances of genocide, the prevalence of placing personal freedoms above those of others, it all adds up to a decline in our innate goodness, and an increase in our global selfishness levels. And, when all is said and done, the calculations indicate that this decline began about a century ago. Which also corresponds to The Hole which we have discovered in the selfishsphere. A Hole, we are sad to report, that has been growing, and continues to grow."

"Those of you who are here today, and those tens of millions listening to me across the globe, have you not noticed the surge in selfishness? When once we looked out for our neighbor's children, as they did for ours, we now reproach our neighbors for how they are raising their kids, while trying to isolate our own from those we deem evil."

"When a disease of uncertain effect turned into a global pandemic, there was some cooperation, at first, but soon far too many people turned their backs on those most vulnerable, refused even to wear a mask to protect their neighbors, family and friends from infection, a very real possibility given that symptoms often lagged by 2 days as compared to being infected. Folks, we lost upwards of 50 million people during the Spanish Flu, back when there were only about 1.5 billion people on the planet, because we systematically ignored the disease, pretended it didn't exist, and of course, had no vaccine to counter it. Conversely, during the 2020-21 coronavirus outbreak, we lost less than 7 million people worldwide out of over 7.7 billion people, because we took mediation measures and developed and distributed a vaccine in record time. Yet even now, there are people who want to prosecute those who led the efforts to save lives, and people who refuse to get a free vaccine due to a misguided belief in personal freedom over community safety."

"Add to that, a current war being waged by an aggressive nation which believes their rights trump those of a sovereign neighbor, and are willing to kill the citizens of that neighbor to advance their self interests. That being bad enough, there has been more than a smattering of protest by those who claim to prize freedom, but are unwilling to spare some money and resources for a nation fighting for its very freedoms."

"Even with capitalism, what most people acknowledge as the best economic system devised to date, we see an abundance of greed and selfishness which has corrupted the concept of opportunity and the pursuit of material happiness and has led to the richest 1% of people owning and controlling almost half of the world's resources."

"All across the globe, the wealthy nations operate in a might makes right mode, taking advantage of those countries which lack the resources and knowledge to improve the livelihood of its citizens, and worse, often taking what few resources they do have with little compensation."

"And in America, Reagan's shining city upon the hill whose beacon light guides freedom-loving people everywhere, the nation most associated with democracy, and freedom, and equality, there is a growing attraction to authoritarianism driven by the selfish belief that people who disagree politically are not patriots, and that election results that disappoint can be overturned through violence and intimidation."

"When cooperation and compromise towards mutual progress equals weakness, and strong leadership is equated to intolerance of different perspectives, when being against diversity, equity and inclusion becomes a rallying cry to make a country better, even though it is diversity through the waves of immigration that makes most Americans first and second generation Americans, even though it is equity that is enshrined in the Declaration of Independence, and even though it is inclusion that has provided opportunity to pursue life, liberty and happiness, well, I guess that tells us everything about the effect of The Hole."

"What does it say about a shining beacon of light for freedom that we spend over $120 billion a year on our pets, an amount greater than the GDP  of over 130 countries, a number that would place it around 60th if it were a country's GDP?  That despite positive gains in the last decade, there are still 2 billion, that is billion, people in the world, without access to clean drinking water?" 

There was a pause, she took a breath, she smiled, this one much more sincere than her last one.   

"However, we are here, not just to paint a picture of doom, but to offer words of hope. Sometimes, it is in the act of understanding, the simple knowledge of a bad situation, that can result in changing that situation. Our belief, a belief founded on the premise that humans are innately good, is that we can counter the loss in strength of the selfishsphere by acknowledging its effects on our actions, personal as well as communal. That, like a diabetic who reads food labels, monitors her diet, exercises, we can monitor our acts of selfishness, exercise random acts of kindness, and reject those who eat away at our collective goodness."

The leaders left the stage to applause; the speech given widespread coverage, widespread acclaim. In the streets, schools, business places, and all areas where people converged and engaged in conversation, a positive outlook was visible, palpable. In subsequent meetings, the leaders who had worked to fashion that speech, felt confident that their approach was correct, their plan a good one.

I would like to say that this marked the beginning of a change which saved ourselves, from ourselves. That the world understood the crisis upon them, and took individual and national action to reward selfless behavior, and shine a light on those acting selfishly. I would like to say that through this collective effort, the selfishsphere somehow healed itself, The Hole stopped growing, began to close. 

But, alas, that was not the case. Partly, because the tale told that day from the building that was supposed to represent the unification of the nations of the planet, was only partly true. Yes, there was some kind of buildup of a cosmic ray that was heretofore unknown in the history of our planet. But the selfishsphere was a fabricated term, a simple way to convey the problem, a throwback to the lessons of Genesis.

Sadly, our species had passed the tipping point. Those for whom selfishness and greed had worked, those who had manipulated the system, rigged the rules in their favor, held too much power and influence, controlled too much global information, or disinformation, in this case. They worked against groups, policies, actions that would have addressed the inequities, the selfishness, the me first influencers. They repeated lies, used words like socialism, and claims that it was all a hoax being perpetrated on the working class by the elite. It was a continuation of the playbook used for millennia by those with the power to retain the status quo, a status quo that favored them, that enabled them to do whatever they wanted. 

And, since there really was no conclusive understanding of how, why or who was responsible for The Hole, it was easy for them to frame the issue in a way that prevented actions which addressed the true root of the problem.

Now, decades later, we have come to realize that it was the lack of identifying the who that gave those most responsible for encouraging the very selfishness that was ruining the species the power to prevent change. Perhaps had we been able to establish that it was an alien force, we could have rallied together against it. Perhaps even, had it been determined that it was our Creator challenging us to prove our worth, we might have been able to merge the great religions towards a global spiritual awakening.

But it was simply us, all along. Mankind had allowed itself to forego its most basic teachings, lessons that transcended all cultures, religions, nations, even our own innate nature itself. The experiment that was our species, the experiment that granted knowledge and the ability to think, empathy and the ability to help others, and a body and the ability to move and thrive within a healthy environment, failed to account for those who sought to place their own comfort and security over that of others, and miscalculated the effect that those most selfish and greedy would have over those struggling to provide comfort and security. 

At this point, as even the obvious effects of The Hole manifest all around us, those who control the flow of information, who use that control to maintain their hold over a disproportionate amount of money, resources and power, have won the day. Perhaps the planet will witness a new iteration of a species like ours, another experiment which might transcend the failures of what has failed in the past, what is about to fail now. 

If it is all just a series of circles, perhaps those circles slowly approach the realization of what life is truly about. Whether our circle, our brief civilization when compared to the age of the universe, and time itself, exists on the continuum in the beginning, middle or towards the end, the answer is not enough to satisfy the disappointment that we have fallen short of the goal, again.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This is not the first post I have written addressing selfishness. Here is a link to one I wrote at the end of 2021.

https://wurdsfromtheburbs.blogspot.com/2021/12/selfishness-and-patriotism.html