In addition to spending time with all these people, I look
forward to reading by the pool, falling asleep in the sun, jumping in the cool
water, and starting that cycle over again.
Apropos to the reading/sleeping/pool cycle, I read the August edition of the
National Geographic. Two articles
particularly interested me.
The first was called Sugar Love (A not so sweet story). It traced the history of sugar, its modest
beginning as a spice, rare, and only known to a small group of people in the
islands of the Pacific off the Asian mainland.
From there it spread across Asia via the march of the Arab armies in the
first millennia AD, and then was introduced to the Europeans during the
Crusades. As the taste for sugar gained
traction in Europe and since trade between Europe and Asia did not prosper, new
sources for sugar were required, and with the discovery of the New World,
specifically the islands of the Caribbean, a source was found. Here is a link to that article.
Of course, like most people, I was aware of the connection
between the expansion of the slave trade and the need for cheap labor. However, this article provided some
details that I did not know about.
According to the article, over the course of a few centuries, over 11
million Africans were shipped to the New World, more than half ending up on
sugar plantations. Perhaps it sounds a
bit dramatic to say, but there is a graphic illustration of the bloody and
inhumane connection between sugar production and satisfying the sugar cravings
of Europe. A slave of the time, who is
missing an arm and a leg, states “When we work in the sugar mills and we catch
our finger in the millstone, they cut off our hand; when we try to run away,
they cut off a leg; both things happened to me.
It is at this price that you eat sugar in Europe.”
Well, at least we don’t do that anymore, one might say. And yes, perhaps we have evolved, as I
continually hope, in a manner in which we value human life a bit more
highly. Yet it is still true that
workers in gold mines in Africa receive a miniscule amount of compensation for
efforts that yield mine operators millions of dollars. And it is still true that the rulers of
various third world nations make deals resulting in lucrative contracts for
them and their western business partners, but paltry salaries for the labor
force. And, while some may debate this
trend, it even seems true that here in America, the value of labor has been
kept artificially low in the past thirty years while those with wealth take a
bigger percentage of the pie.
To me, It would be better if, instead of (or perhaps in
addition to) learning the lessons of economics which includes the desire for
cheap labor to provide new tastes, or precious metals, or inexpensive consumer
goods, or lower cost energy, we were to focus more on the cost to indigenous
populations, local environments, or the imported labor that is exploited to
provide that new taste or cheaper energy.
It is all too easy to dismiss the days of forced labor and the toll that
unregulated mining and non-existent air pollution controls had on our air and
water and land, now that those days seem to be in the past, unless it was your
ancestor who was forced into slavery, your land that was mined and left dead,
your water and air that was fouled. So,
when we debate the issues surrounding the Keystone Pipeline, fracking,
repealing some of the teeth behind the Clean Air and Water Acts, or even the
minimum wage, it might be wise for us to consider the immediate cost to the
people who risk limb and health for our newest western technology, might be of
benefit to include the long terms costs of shooting chemicals into the ground
or digging holes in the ocean, perhaps even include requirements to consider the cost of cleanup when that pipeline bursts or that oil rig explodes, as
opposed to weighing everything by the short term benefit of some temporary
jobs or a few additional percentage points of profit.
It is said, by some, that man's progress has been marked by upheaval, violence, the suffering of the few for the benefit of the many. Perhaps that is how it will always be. For the good of the whole, the few will pay the price. Whether it be through wars, low wage labor, lack of environmental safeguards or just plain greed and non-caring, there may always be situations and events that require some people to suffer while others prosper. It would just be nice, the Christian thing, if those humans on the advantage side were to recognize the pain of those on the sacrifice side as opposed to actively abusing them, and/or consciously developing ways to profit from that sacrifice.
The second article was about the Mayan civilization,
specifically about their ability to mark time.
I imagine that all civilizations, all people who reflect on their moment
in time, think that they are alive at man’s most evolved moment. Those advanced Greeks who first discussed
democracy over 2000 years ago probably thought they were living during the
greatest time in history just as the great thinkers and artists of the 17th
century Renaissance regarded themselves in a similar manner as did the great
inventors and entrepreneurs of the recent century who gave us flight,
computers, and instant, global
communication. But sometimes I
think in our mutual rush to glorify our particular time and contributions, we
forget that greatness, uniqueness, times of incredible bursts of progress, all
build upon what has come before.
Sometimes I sense that we believe that our 21st century
condition exists in a vacuum, forgetting that the basics for so many of our
advanced technologies were imagined and developed in past times. Here is that link.
The Mayan article detailed their ability to
identify the exact moment each year when the sun was directly overhead. This twice yearly event enabled them to
adjust their calendars which helped them plan for planting and harvesting. Their advanced understanding of the cycles of
the sun and the seasons produced a civilization that lasted a few thousand years
despite soil with little moisture retention.
When we focus on their poly-theistic religions, their belief in the need
for sacrifice to appease the gods, be it food, animal or human, their agrarian
society without industry, we gloss over the simple facts that their understanding
of the cycles of nature was perhaps more advanced than our own. Well, maybe not more advanced, as a hurricane in their time would have most likely been devastating as well as a surprise event, but more advanced in the practical use of the knowledge they gleaned from nature. They knew the signs of a coming good or bad harvest and took the appropriate measures to feast or conserve. With all our high-end technology, we seem to act or not act based on economic or political reasons (see the continued debate on climate change) as opposed to what is required for base survival.
History indicates that the peak of the Mayan civilization was about 650 years, from AD 250-900. It is also conjectured that the Mayan people existed from as far back as 1800 BC. By simple arithmetic, we can conclude that these people were present in the area of the Yucatan Peninsula for more than 2500 years.
As I said before, in an age when one can type an essay from a desk in Perkasie, PA, post it and have it become available to anyone, practically everywhere in the world in an instant, when telescopes have been developed that enable us to "see" practically to the beginning of the universe, when bombs have been created that can be released hundreds of miles away yet hit an individual target the size of a man, it is normal to assume that we believe that we represent the apex of human existence to date. But perhaps before we rush to judgment we need to survive the test of time, to be around in the year 4000 before we come to that conclusion. And to more fully understand that we are only us, now, because of the past.
Gorgeous!
ReplyDelete