In reality, domestic divide on the most important issues of the day, lively debate, even rancor, heated words, and anger should be understood as the byproducts of a democracy in which everyone has a say, and is listened to, and in which freedom of speech is of the utmost importance. It is very easy to see the alternative, nations where political adversaries are jailed or disappeared, where the press is controlled by the government, and where public dissent with the policies of those in charge is consigned to secret meetings, whispers, and underground publications.
Democracy, real democracy, is messy, boisterous, even unruly, at times. Which is precisely why we are embroiled in so much division. Both sides feel that the future is at stake. Both sides feel that the wrong path, the other sides' path, will lead to ruin. Both sides feel that the other side is the problem.
And, that is OK as long as both sides realize that neither side is always right or always wrong. And that debating the issues, laying out the facts and reasoning for one's viewpoints, then listening while those in opposition lay out their facts and reasons, is the basis, the very foundation of our American democracy.
We seem to forget that many of the root issues we debate today, were debated just as vociferously by the founders before and after they conceived and signed the Bill of Rights and the Constitution. State rights vs federal, business interests vs citizens, the rule of law, voting rights, the place of a specified religion in the laws of the nation, and on and on, the issues we wrangle over today have not changed as much as some would have you think, were not "decided" upon in the late 1700's by those who created this country.
Anyone who has read the views of Jefferson, Adams, Washington, Franklin, Monroe, Hamilton, etc, knows that they disagreed, sometimes fundamentally, about the issues. But, despite those disagreements, they found enough common ground to establish the amazing set of rules that guide us today, including the creation of three branches of government, so that there are checks and balances to prevent the emergence of an authoritarian government.
Which brings us to the other definition of civil, acting in a courteous and polite fashion. Again, were the founders always civil in their disagreements? Of course not, they were human, after all, with their own set of foibles and flaws. Did they continue to write letters to each other, even after the big decisions were made, and the country began its course to marry the incredibly lofty ideals of the Constitution and Bill of Rights with the more baser drives of greed and a lust for power, that can poison those who get a taste for too much of either?
Anyone who has read the views of Jefferson, Adams, Washington, Franklin, Monroe, Hamilton, etc, knows that they disagreed, sometimes fundamentally, about the issues. But, despite those disagreements, they found enough common ground to establish the amazing set of rules that guide us today, including the creation of three branches of government, so that there are checks and balances to prevent the emergence of an authoritarian government.
Which brings us to the other definition of civil, acting in a courteous and polite fashion. Again, were the founders always civil in their disagreements? Of course not, they were human, after all, with their own set of foibles and flaws. Did they continue to write letters to each other, even after the big decisions were made, and the country began its course to marry the incredibly lofty ideals of the Constitution and Bill of Rights with the more baser drives of greed and a lust for power, that can poison those who get a taste for too much of either?
Perhaps a review of the letters written by Adams and Jefferson to each other might remind us that these two great minds still debated and struggled with the practical realization of the ideals they set forth in 1776.
It is high time we demanded from ourselves and our leaders, some civility. No more confronting those we disagree with politically as they eat a meal with their families. No more calling a candidate for public office wacky or low IQ. No more referring to another political party as evil. No more comparing an occupant in the White House with an orangutan. No more stereotyping in which all people of a certain group, whether it be race, gender, religion or political affiliation, are judged by the actions of a few, because that kind of judgement condemns us all and frankly, if the creator uses that philosophy when she decides who is to enter heaven and who is not, we will all find a closed sign on the pearly gates.
Also, no more negative campaign literature and ads. Let's outlaw them, not because we don't believe in free speech, but because we expect our candidates to tell us what they will do for us, what policies they will support, what their philosophy is regarding the environment, or income inequality, or immigration, or any of the important issues upon which we should be making our decisions when we cast our ballots. (Perhaps we might consider starting a campaign whereby all negative mail is returned to sender, forcing them to dispose of it after paying for its delivery).
And, the big one, let's all take a breath, a step back, a respite even, from liking and retweeting and whatever else is done on social media with all the horrible comments about those with whom we disagree. It is not only uncivil, it plays into the hands of our enemies, those countries that our turning our advanced freedoms against us, by implanting all kinds of divisive comments within the social media structure and watching with glee as we spread it among our fellow citizens. Those who would see our democracy fail, are using the strengths of our country against us, and we are falling head and tails into their trap. We are losing the battle because we are being used to fight against ourselves.
I ask this of all politicians, GOP and DEM alike. Disagree, it is OK, and important. But do so with the understanding that, in the end, you must work together to improve the lives of all Americas, those who support you and those who do not.
Finally, I implore President Trump to lead the way in this endeavor. To truly be the most important person in our country by setting the example. By taking the high road when insulted by a liberal pundit, by allowing questions of media outlets that reflect a different point of view, by understanding that he won an election, not a crown, and that he represents all the American people, not just those who voted for him or who cheer him at his rallies. Only then, can he achieve credibility with those that disagree with his politics and policies, and only then can he ask for others to "clean up their acts".
It is high time we demanded from ourselves and our leaders, some civility. No more confronting those we disagree with politically as they eat a meal with their families. No more calling a candidate for public office wacky or low IQ. No more referring to another political party as evil. No more comparing an occupant in the White House with an orangutan. No more stereotyping in which all people of a certain group, whether it be race, gender, religion or political affiliation, are judged by the actions of a few, because that kind of judgement condemns us all and frankly, if the creator uses that philosophy when she decides who is to enter heaven and who is not, we will all find a closed sign on the pearly gates.
Also, no more negative campaign literature and ads. Let's outlaw them, not because we don't believe in free speech, but because we expect our candidates to tell us what they will do for us, what policies they will support, what their philosophy is regarding the environment, or income inequality, or immigration, or any of the important issues upon which we should be making our decisions when we cast our ballots. (Perhaps we might consider starting a campaign whereby all negative mail is returned to sender, forcing them to dispose of it after paying for its delivery).
And, the big one, let's all take a breath, a step back, a respite even, from liking and retweeting and whatever else is done on social media with all the horrible comments about those with whom we disagree. It is not only uncivil, it plays into the hands of our enemies, those countries that our turning our advanced freedoms against us, by implanting all kinds of divisive comments within the social media structure and watching with glee as we spread it among our fellow citizens. Those who would see our democracy fail, are using the strengths of our country against us, and we are falling head and tails into their trap. We are losing the battle because we are being used to fight against ourselves.
I ask this of all politicians, GOP and DEM alike. Disagree, it is OK, and important. But do so with the understanding that, in the end, you must work together to improve the lives of all Americas, those who support you and those who do not.
Finally, I implore President Trump to lead the way in this endeavor. To truly be the most important person in our country by setting the example. By taking the high road when insulted by a liberal pundit, by allowing questions of media outlets that reflect a different point of view, by understanding that he won an election, not a crown, and that he represents all the American people, not just those who voted for him or who cheer him at his rallies. Only then, can he achieve credibility with those that disagree with his politics and policies, and only then can he ask for others to "clean up their acts".
No comments:
Post a Comment